problemreductions/rules/flowshopscheduling_ilp.rs
1//! Reduction from FlowShopScheduling to `ILP<i64>`.
2//!
3//! Binary order variables y_{i,j} with y_{i,j}=1 iff job i precedes job j,
4//! integer completion-time variables C_{j,q} for each job j and machine q.
5//! Machine-chain and big-M disjunctive constraints enforce a valid flow-shop
6//! schedule; the deadline becomes a makespan bound.
7
8use crate::models::algebraic::{LinearConstraint, ObjectiveSense, ILP};
9use crate::models::misc::FlowShopScheduling;
10use crate::reduction;
11use crate::rules::traits::{ReduceTo, ReductionResult};
12
13/// Result of reducing FlowShopScheduling to `ILP<i64>`.
14///
15/// Variable layout:
16/// - `y_{i,j}` for each ordered pair (i,j) with i<j: index `i*n + j - (i+1)*(i+2)/2`
17/// (upper triangle, n*(n-1)/2 variables)
18/// - `C_{j,q}` for j in 0..n, q in 0..m: index `num_order_vars + j*m + q`
19///
20/// Total: n*(n-1)/2 + n*m variables.
21#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
22pub struct ReductionFSSToILP {
23 target: ILP<i64>,
24 num_jobs: usize,
25 num_machines: usize,
26 num_order_vars: usize,
27}
28
29impl ReductionResult for ReductionFSSToILP {
30 type Source = FlowShopScheduling;
31 type Target = ILP<i64>;
32
33 fn target_problem(&self) -> &ILP<i64> {
34 &self.target
35 }
36
37 /// Extract solution by sorting jobs by final-machine completion time C_{j,m-1}.
38 fn extract_solution(
39 &self,
40 target_solution: &<Self::Target as crate::traits::Problem>::Solution,
41 ) -> crate::rules::ExtractionResult<<Self::Source as crate::traits::Problem>::Solution> {
42 crate::rules::traits::validate_target_solution(self.target_problem(), target_solution)?;
43
44 Ok({
45 let n = self.num_jobs;
46 let m = self.num_machines;
47 let c_offset = self.num_order_vars;
48 let mut jobs: Vec<usize> = (0..n).collect();
49 jobs.sort_by_key(|&j| {
50 let idx = c_offset + j * m + (m - 1);
51 (target_solution[idx], j)
52 });
53 jobs
54 })
55 }
56}
57
58#[reduction(transform = upper_bound {
59 num_vars = "num_jobs * (num_jobs - 1) / 2 + num_jobs * num_processors",
60 num_constraints = "num_jobs * (num_jobs - 1) + num_jobs + num_jobs * (num_processors - 1) + num_jobs * (num_jobs - 1) * num_processors + num_jobs",
61},
62 unavailable = {
63 num_nonzeros = "the exact target parameter is not represented by this reduction's symbolic transform",
64 }
65)]
66impl ReduceTo<ILP<i64>> for FlowShopScheduling {
67 type Result = ReductionFSSToILP;
68
69 fn reduce_to(&self) -> Result<Self::Result, crate::rules::ReductionError> {
70 let n = self.num_jobs();
71 let m = self.num_processors();
72
73 let num_order_vars = n * n.saturating_sub(1) / 2;
74 let num_completion_vars = n * m;
75 let num_vars = num_order_vars + num_completion_vars;
76
77 // Order variable index for pair (i, j) with i < j
78 let order_var = |i: usize, j: usize| -> usize {
79 debug_assert!(i < j);
80 i * (2 * n - i - 1) / 2 + (j - i - 1)
81 };
82 // Completion time variable index for job j, machine q
83 let c_var = |j: usize, q: usize| -> usize { num_order_vars + j * m + q };
84
85 let p = self.task_lengths();
86 let d = self.deadline();
87 let deadline = d;
88
89 // Big-M: D + max processing time
90 let max_p = p
91 .iter()
92 .flat_map(|row| row.iter())
93 .copied()
94 .max()
95 .unwrap_or(0);
96 let big_m = d.checked_add(max_p).ok_or_else(|| {
97 crate::rules::ReductionError::integer_overflow::<FlowShopScheduling, ILP<i64>>(
98 "computing the flow-shop big-M bound",
99 )
100 })?;
101 let mut constraints = Vec::new();
102
103 // 1. Symmetry: y_{i,j} + y_{j,i} = 1 for all i != j
104 // Since we only store y_{i,j} for i < j, we enforce y_{i,j} in {0,1}
105 // via 0 <= y_{i,j} <= 1.
106 for i in 0..n {
107 for j in (i + 1)..n {
108 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::le(vec![(order_var(i, j), 1)], 1));
109 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::ge(vec![(order_var(i, j), 1)], 0));
110 }
111 }
112
113 // 2. C_{j,0} >= p_{j,0} for all j
114 for (j, p_j) in p.iter().enumerate() {
115 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::ge(vec![(c_var(j, 0), 1)], p_j[0]));
116 }
117
118 // 3. Machine chain: C_{j,q+1} >= C_{j,q} + p_{j,q+1} for all j, q in 0..m-1
119 for (j, p_j) in p.iter().enumerate() {
120 for q in 0..(m.saturating_sub(1)) {
121 // C_{j,q+1} - C_{j,q} >= p_{j,q+1}
122 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::ge(
123 vec![(c_var(j, q + 1), 1), (c_var(j, q), -1)],
124 p_j[q + 1],
125 ));
126 }
127 }
128
129 // 4. Disjunctive: C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q} - M*(1 - y_{i,j}) for i != j, all q
130 // For i < j: y_{i,j} is the variable.
131 // C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} + M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q} + M ... wrong
132 // Actually: C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q} - M*(1 - y_{i,j})
133 // => C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} + M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q} ... when y_{i,j}=0 (i NOT before j): inactive
134 // when y_{i,j}=1 (i before j): C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q}
135 // Wait, this needs reconsideration. The paper says:
136 // C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q} - M*(1 - y_{i,j})
137 // => C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} - M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q} - M
138 // No let me expand directly:
139 // C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} + M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q} + M*(0)... hmm
140 //
141 // Let me re-derive: C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q} - M*(1 - y_{i,j})
142 // = C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} + M*(1 - y_{i,j}) >= p_{j,q}
143 // = C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} + M - M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q}
144 // = C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} - M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q} - M
145 for i in 0..n {
146 for (j, p_j) in p.iter().enumerate() {
147 if i == j {
148 continue;
149 }
150 for (q, &p_jq) in p_j.iter().enumerate() {
151 if i < j {
152 // y_{i,j} is the variable. When y_{i,j} = 1, i precedes j,
153 // so C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q}.
154 // C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} - M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q} - M
155 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::ge(
156 vec![
157 (c_var(j, q), 1),
158 (c_var(i, q), -1),
159 (order_var(i, j), -big_m),
160 ],
161 p_jq - big_m,
162 ));
163 } else {
164 // i > j: y_{j,i} is stored. y_{i,j} = 1 - y_{j,i}.
165 // C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q} - M*(1 - (1 - y_{j,i}))
166 // C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q} - M*y_{j,i}
167 // C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} + M*y_{j,i} >= p_{j,q}
168 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::ge(
169 vec![
170 (c_var(j, q), 1),
171 (c_var(i, q), -1),
172 (order_var(j, i), big_m),
173 ],
174 p_jq,
175 ));
176 }
177 }
178 }
179 }
180
181 // 5. Deadline: C_{j,m-1} <= D for all j
182 if m > 0 {
183 for j in 0..n {
184 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::le(vec![(c_var(j, m - 1), 1)], deadline));
185 }
186 }
187
188 Ok(ReductionFSSToILP {
189 target: ILP::new(num_vars, constraints, vec![], ObjectiveSense::Minimize)
190 .map_err(Self::target_construction)?,
191 num_jobs: n,
192 num_machines: m,
193 num_order_vars,
194 })
195 }
196}
197
198#[cfg(feature = "example-db")]
199pub(crate) fn canonical_rule_example_specs() -> Vec<crate::example_db::specs::RuleExampleSpec> {
200 vec![crate::example_db::specs::RuleExampleSpec {
201 id: "flowshopscheduling_to_ilp",
202 build: || {
203 // 2 machines, 3 jobs, deadline 10
204 let source = FlowShopScheduling::new(2, vec![vec![2, 3], vec![3, 2], vec![1, 4]], 10);
205 crate::example_db::specs::rule_example_via_ilp::<_, i64>(source)
206 },
207 }]
208}
209
210#[cfg(test)]
211#[path = "../unit_tests/rules/flowshopscheduling_ilp.rs"]
212mod tests;