problemreductions/rules/flowshopscheduling_ilp.rs
1//! Reduction from FlowShopScheduling to ILP<i32>.
2//!
3//! Binary order variables y_{i,j} with y_{i,j}=1 iff job i precedes job j,
4//! integer completion-time variables C_{j,q} for each job j and machine q.
5//! Machine-chain and big-M disjunctive constraints enforce a valid flow-shop
6//! schedule; the deadline becomes a makespan bound.
7
8use crate::models::algebraic::{LinearConstraint, ObjectiveSense, ILP};
9use crate::models::misc::FlowShopScheduling;
10use crate::reduction;
11use crate::rules::ilp_helpers::permutation_to_lehmer;
12use crate::rules::traits::{ReduceTo, ReductionResult};
13
14/// Result of reducing FlowShopScheduling to ILP<i32>.
15///
16/// Variable layout:
17/// - `y_{i,j}` for each ordered pair (i,j) with i<j: index `i*n + j - (i+1)*(i+2)/2`
18/// (upper triangle, n*(n-1)/2 variables)
19/// - `C_{j,q}` for j in 0..n, q in 0..m: index `num_order_vars + j*m + q`
20///
21/// Total: n*(n-1)/2 + n*m variables.
22#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
23pub struct ReductionFSSToILP {
24 target: ILP<i32>,
25 num_jobs: usize,
26 num_machines: usize,
27 num_order_vars: usize,
28}
29
30impl ReductionFSSToILP {
31 fn encode_schedule_as_lehmer(schedule: &[usize]) -> Vec<usize> {
32 let mut available: Vec<usize> = (0..schedule.len()).collect();
33 let mut config = Vec::with_capacity(schedule.len());
34 for &task in schedule {
35 let digit = available
36 .iter()
37 .position(|&c| c == task)
38 .expect("schedule must be a permutation");
39 config.push(digit);
40 available.remove(digit);
41 }
42 config
43 }
44}
45
46impl ReductionResult for ReductionFSSToILP {
47 type Source = FlowShopScheduling;
48 type Target = ILP<i32>;
49
50 fn target_problem(&self) -> &ILP<i32> {
51 &self.target
52 }
53
54 /// Extract solution: sort jobs by final-machine completion time C_{j,m-1},
55 /// then convert permutation to Lehmer code.
56 fn extract_solution(&self, target_solution: &[usize]) -> Vec<usize> {
57 let n = self.num_jobs;
58 let m = self.num_machines;
59 let c_offset = self.num_order_vars;
60 let mut jobs: Vec<usize> = (0..n).collect();
61 jobs.sort_by_key(|&j| {
62 let idx = c_offset + j * m + (m - 1);
63 (target_solution.get(idx).copied().unwrap_or(0), j)
64 });
65 let perm = permutation_to_lehmer(&jobs);
66 Self::encode_schedule_as_lehmer(&jobs)
67 .into_iter()
68 .zip(perm)
69 .map(|(lehmer, _)| lehmer)
70 .collect()
71 }
72}
73
74#[reduction(overhead = {
75 num_vars = "num_jobs * (num_jobs - 1) / 2 + num_jobs * num_processors",
76 num_constraints = "num_jobs * (num_jobs - 1) / 2 + num_jobs + num_jobs * (num_processors - 1) + num_jobs * (num_jobs - 1) * num_processors + num_jobs",
77})]
78impl ReduceTo<ILP<i32>> for FlowShopScheduling {
79 type Result = ReductionFSSToILP;
80
81 fn reduce_to(&self) -> Self::Result {
82 let n = self.num_jobs();
83 let m = self.num_processors();
84
85 let num_order_vars = n * n.saturating_sub(1) / 2;
86 let num_completion_vars = n * m;
87 let num_vars = num_order_vars + num_completion_vars;
88
89 // Order variable index for pair (i, j) with i < j
90 let order_var = |i: usize, j: usize| -> usize {
91 debug_assert!(i < j);
92 i * (2 * n - i - 1) / 2 + (j - i - 1)
93 };
94 // Completion time variable index for job j, machine q
95 let c_var = |j: usize, q: usize| -> usize { num_order_vars + j * m + q };
96
97 let p = self.task_lengths();
98 let d = self.deadline();
99
100 // Big-M: D + max processing time
101 let max_p = p
102 .iter()
103 .flat_map(|row| row.iter())
104 .copied()
105 .max()
106 .unwrap_or(0);
107 let big_m = (d + max_p) as f64;
108
109 let mut constraints = Vec::new();
110
111 // 1. Symmetry: y_{i,j} + y_{j,i} = 1 for all i != j
112 // Since we only store y_{i,j} for i < j, we enforce y_{i,j} in {0,1}
113 // via 0 <= y_{i,j} <= 1.
114 for i in 0..n {
115 for j in (i + 1)..n {
116 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::le(vec![(order_var(i, j), 1.0)], 1.0));
117 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::ge(vec![(order_var(i, j), 1.0)], 0.0));
118 }
119 }
120
121 // 2. C_{j,0} >= p_{j,0} for all j
122 for (j, p_j) in p.iter().enumerate() {
123 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::ge(
124 vec![(c_var(j, 0), 1.0)],
125 p_j[0] as f64,
126 ));
127 }
128
129 // 3. Machine chain: C_{j,q+1} >= C_{j,q} + p_{j,q+1} for all j, q in 0..m-1
130 for (j, p_j) in p.iter().enumerate() {
131 for q in 0..(m.saturating_sub(1)) {
132 // C_{j,q+1} - C_{j,q} >= p_{j,q+1}
133 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::ge(
134 vec![(c_var(j, q + 1), 1.0), (c_var(j, q), -1.0)],
135 p_j[q + 1] as f64,
136 ));
137 }
138 }
139
140 // 4. Disjunctive: C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q} - M*(1 - y_{i,j}) for i != j, all q
141 // For i < j: y_{i,j} is the variable.
142 // C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} + M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q} + M ... wrong
143 // Actually: C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q} - M*(1 - y_{i,j})
144 // => C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} + M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q} ... when y_{i,j}=0 (i NOT before j): inactive
145 // when y_{i,j}=1 (i before j): C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q}
146 // Wait, this needs reconsideration. The paper says:
147 // C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q} - M*(1 - y_{i,j})
148 // => C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} - M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q} - M
149 // No let me expand directly:
150 // C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} + M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q} + M*(0)... hmm
151 //
152 // Let me re-derive: C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q} - M*(1 - y_{i,j})
153 // = C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} + M*(1 - y_{i,j}) >= p_{j,q}
154 // = C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} + M - M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q}
155 // = C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} - M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q} - M
156 for i in 0..n {
157 for (j, p_j) in p.iter().enumerate() {
158 if i == j {
159 continue;
160 }
161 for (q, &p_jq) in p_j.iter().enumerate() {
162 if i < j {
163 // y_{i,j} is the variable. When y_{i,j} = 1, i precedes j,
164 // so C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q}.
165 // C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} - M*y_{i,j} >= p_{j,q} - M
166 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::ge(
167 vec![
168 (c_var(j, q), 1.0),
169 (c_var(i, q), -1.0),
170 (order_var(i, j), -big_m),
171 ],
172 p_jq as f64 - big_m,
173 ));
174 } else {
175 // i > j: y_{j,i} is stored. y_{i,j} = 1 - y_{j,i}.
176 // C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q} - M*(1 - (1 - y_{j,i}))
177 // C_{j,q} >= C_{i,q} + p_{j,q} - M*y_{j,i}
178 // C_{j,q} - C_{i,q} + M*y_{j,i} >= p_{j,q}
179 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::ge(
180 vec![
181 (c_var(j, q), 1.0),
182 (c_var(i, q), -1.0),
183 (order_var(j, i), big_m),
184 ],
185 p_jq as f64,
186 ));
187 }
188 }
189 }
190 }
191
192 // 5. Deadline: C_{j,m-1} <= D for all j
193 if m > 0 {
194 for j in 0..n {
195 constraints.push(LinearConstraint::le(vec![(c_var(j, m - 1), 1.0)], d as f64));
196 }
197 }
198
199 ReductionFSSToILP {
200 target: ILP::new(num_vars, constraints, vec![], ObjectiveSense::Minimize),
201 num_jobs: n,
202 num_machines: m,
203 num_order_vars,
204 }
205 }
206}
207
208#[cfg(feature = "example-db")]
209pub(crate) fn canonical_rule_example_specs() -> Vec<crate::example_db::specs::RuleExampleSpec> {
210 vec![crate::example_db::specs::RuleExampleSpec {
211 id: "flowshopscheduling_to_ilp",
212 build: || {
213 // 2 machines, 3 jobs, deadline 10
214 let source = FlowShopScheduling::new(2, vec![vec![2, 3], vec![3, 2], vec![1, 4]], 10);
215 crate::example_db::specs::rule_example_via_ilp::<_, i32>(source)
216 },
217 }]
218}
219
220#[cfg(test)]
221#[path = "../unit_tests/rules/flowshopscheduling_ilp.rs"]
222mod tests;