3-uniform Set Splitting → Binary two-root proper forest Complexity open
Solution submitted Research history & proof on GitHub ↗
Why this question matters
The question separates easy spanning-forest existence from the constraints imposed by proper phylogenetic forest representations.
The relevant restriction requires binary networks, exactly two roots and a proper spanning forest with the original leaves; hardness without these restrictions does not settle it.
The reduction to construct
The source gives a finite ground set and an explicit family of three-element subsets. A valid output assigns two colors so that every subset meets both colors, or reports NO-SOLUTION.
The target is a weakly connected binary acyclic network with exactly two roots. Find a spanning forest rooted at those roots, with the original leaves, such that every excluded edge joins different components, or report NO-SOLUTION. Roots have indegree/outdegree (0,2), internal vertices (1,2) or (2,1), and leaves (1,0).
Construct deterministic polynomial-time maps F and G: F sends every legal source instance to a legal target instance, and G(x,y) is a valid source output for every valid output y of F(x). Preserve the stated threshold, domain and promises. The requested complexity conclusion is NP-hardness for the stated target problem.
Every valid forest must encode a split, including forests using unintended parent choices.
What a complete answer must include
Give explicit construction and recovery algorithms, a general proof for every legal input and every valid target output, and polynomial runtime and encoding-size bounds. Specify finite output encodings and handle NO-SOLUTION outputs when applicable. Tests compare recovered source outputs with independent source solutions.
References
- Information Processing Letters 187 (2025), 106500 ↗
- full journal PDF ↗
- TCS 1024 (2025), 114907 ↗
- full PDF ↗
- 2308.11176 ↗
Literature checked 2026-09-16. This summarizes the archived literature search on the date above. Unpublished, unindexed and overlooked work remains outside coverage; no new novelty assessment was performed.