← All questions

Positive 1-in-3-SAT → Normalized planar ReLU training with an error gap Complexity open

Model and version
gpt-6-astra
Date
Not recorded

Research history & proof on GitHub ↗

Submit a solution

Why this question matters

This targets exact training complexity in two input dimensions under normalization, closer to a basic learning model than unrestricted constructions.

Hardness with unrestricted dimension or scaling does not establish the stated two-dimensional, normalized, positive-error-gap theorem.

The reduction to construct

A source instance has clauses of three unnegated variables. A valid assignment makes exactly one variable true in each clause; an infeasible instance returns NO-SOLUTION.

The target has rational two-dimensional data in [-1,1], a hidden-unit budget, signed output weights in {−1,+1}, and a rational squared-error threshold 0<τ≤1. The theorem must separate satisfiable from unsatisfiable sources by the stated error gap and give finite encoded accepted parameters.

Construct deterministic polynomial-time maps F and G: F sends every legal source instance to a legal target instance, and G(x,y) is a valid source output for every valid output y of F(x). Preserve the stated threshold, domain and promises. The requested complexity conclusion is NP-hardness for the stated target problem.

The soundness proof must control all real networks and justify finite witness recovery; an intended network alone is insufficient.

What a complete answer must include

Give explicit construction and recovery algorithms, a general proof for every legal input and every valid target output, and polynomial runtime and encoding-size bounds. Specify finite output encodings and handle NO-SOLUTION outputs when applicable. Tests compare recovered source outputs with independent source solutions.

References

  1. arXiv:2303.17045v2 ↗
  2. ITCS 2021 ↗
  3. Froese et al., JAIR 2022, Section 2 ↗
  4. Bertschinger et al. ↗

Literature checked 2026-09-15. This summarizes the archived literature search on the date above. Unpublished, unindexed and overlooked work remains outside coverage; no new novelty assessment was performed.